MOPC header.png

Massachusetts Office of Public Collaboration

MOPC logo.png
 

MOPC’s public mandate as the statutory State Office of Dispute Resolution is to assist state and local government with development and implementation of evidence-based dispute resolution policies and programming and to provide effective forums for collaborative problem-solving and community engagement on contentious public issues.

Contact:
Telephone: (617) 287-4040
Email: mopc@umb.edu
Website: umb.edu/MOPC

Executive Director: Susan Jeghelian
Associate Director of Research: Madhawa Palihapitiya
Director of Community Mediation Programs: Courtney Breese

 

Address:
University of Massachusetts, Boston
100 Morrissey Boulevard
Boston, MA 02125
Get directions

MOPC Serves Communities Statewide Through the Following Programs:

  • MA Agricultural Mediation Program (MAMP) – USDA funded

  • MA Community Mediation Center Grant Program (CMC-GP) – State funded

  • MA Parent Mediation Program (PMP) child access & visitation – HHS funded through DOR

  • MA Housing Appeals Committee Program (HAC-MP) 40B cases – DHCD/MHP funded

  • Prisoner Reentry Mediation Pilot (ReMAp) – pre-release mediation/MD model (with DOC)

  • Youth Conflict Resolution Program – State funded

  • Probate & Family Court – DOR Onsite Mediation Program – parenting issues – Court funded

MOPC Services Offered:

Program Development and Administration
Capacity-Building and Training
Conflict Assessment
Consensus-Building
Deliberative Dialogue
Public Dispute Resolution & Mediation
Dispute Systems Design
Evaluation and Research

Example of our Services:

MOPC was engaged by a town to design and run a civil discourse initiative with the purpose of facilitating community dialogue and gathering community input on how the town could address the issue of incivility and create a more inclusive community. Although launched in response to the uncivil environment online, the initiative purposely remained broader. To get a better sense of the issues at hand, MOPC conducted a series of interviews and distributed a community-wide survey. The input gathered was used to develop a deliberative dialogue framework for the community to discuss how to create a more inclusive and engaged town.